Archive - August, 2011

Bible in the Dirt: Ancient New York in the Bible

Why would a young woman go into a field and sleep on the feet of a man she hardly knew? And where did people go to the bathroom? And why would anyone want oil poured on their head? Good questions that require some digging. Lots of different ancient cultures collide in Scripture, and that’s what we explore on Wednesdays. Because your understanding of history affects how well you understand the Bible. So let’s dig in. 

Genesis 11:31
Terah took his son Abram, his grandson Lot son of Haran, and his daughter-in-law Sarai, the wife of his son Abram, and together they set out from Ur of the Chaldeans to go to Canaan.”


Abraham came from a city in southern Iraq called Ur of the Chaldeans. Not a very elegant name, sounds more like a backwater town than a thriving New York-type place. But the truth is that it
was an ancient New York. They certainly lacked nothing when it came to style. To the right is the headdress worn by Queen Pu-abi around 2550 BC. Lady GaGa would feel right at home in a hat like that.

 

And they weren’t slackers about art either. Below is The Standard of Ur. Not only does it show us the beauty of their art, but it gives us a glimpse into life in ancient Ur. It has two sides, one for peace and one for war. The peace side has performing musicians, livestock and fish, and people bringing gifts to the king. The men are all bare-chested and wear something akin to a kilt; some are bald, some have long hair.

 

The war side (that’s the side you can see below) shows elegant chariots being pulled by noble donkeys (we normally think of donkeys as meek little animals, but they weren’t) and soldiers headed for battle.

 

 

Then there was the town’s main attraction: the Ziggurat of Ur (below). Almost sounds German, but it isn’t. A ziggurat is a huge temple made of mud bricks for the purpose of worshiping the gods, and the ziggurat in Ur of the Chaldees was first-rate. It was dedicated to the moon goddess, Nanna (no, not Nanna from Peter Pan).

 

So Ur of the Chaldeans was a thriving culture in Mesopotamia, which means that when God told Abraham to leave Ur and go to the place God would show him, he wasn’t giving up a dusty plot of dirt somewhere in Hickville; he was leaving New York to go into the unknown.

 What would you have done if you were Abraham?

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deep Thoughts on Friday: A Review of “Love Wins” by Rob Bell

 
 
 
The boat has been rocking over “Love Wins” for awhile now, and Rob has been both praised for his views and labeled as a heretic. After reading the book, here is my two cents.

For those of you who don’t know, the full title of the book is “Love Wins: A book about heaven, hell, and the fate of every person who ever lived.”

First off, I’m glad Rob is thinking about the issue, because improper thinking on hell and judgment has painted a terrible picture of God. All one needs to do is spend a few minutes in an atheist Twitter column to feel the animosity towards a god who makes a bunch of rules and then relishes in punishing his creatures forever in hell.

On page 9 he says,

“Often time when I meet atheists and we talk about the god they don’t believe in, we quickly discover that I don’t believe in that god either.”

Good point. We have to be very careful to understand exactly what a person means when talking about God and Jesus Christ because there is so much misunderstanding.

Rob also does a great job pointing out the fact that someday the earth will be transformed into exactly what God wants it to be.

“A proper view of heaven leads not to escape from the world, but to full engagement with it, all with the anticipation of a coming day when things are on earth as they currently are in heaven.” p. 46-47.

This is true. From the book of Revelation, we know that someday this corrupted earth and sky will be replaced with a new one. And then we will live with God in his full glory on the earth forever.

He goes on to recount the various awful things that happen here on earth, of which there are plenty; it is difficult to capture the magnitude of the terrible things humans do to each other.

“To summarize, then, we need a loaded, volatile, adequately violent, dramatic, serious word to describe the very real consequences we experience when we reject the good and true and beautiful life that God has for us…And for that, the word “hell” works quite well.” p. 93

Okay, I’ll grant that the despicable things people do to each other fall into the category of “hellish,” but I’m not ready to leave hell at only that. Is hell limited to the atrocities humans cook up for each other? Rob isn’t clear if he’s willing to leave it at that either, but his lack of further conversation about hell makes me wonder if that’s what he’s doing.

Next up: “Does God get what he wants?” Good question. Rob weaves through Scripture, pointing out the fact that God wants everyone to be saved; he then lands on a letter Martin Luther wrote. In regards to the dead possibly getting a second chance to repent, Luther asks “Who would doubt God’s ability to do that?” p. 106.

True, God is God and can do whatever he wants, but “Does God get what he wants” is not a question Rob wants to answer. The real question for him is, do we get what we want? For that, the answer is an unequivocal ‘yes.’

“If we want isolation, despair, and the right to be our own god, God graciously grants us that option….The more we want nothing to do with all God is, the more distance and space are created. If we want nothing to do with love, we are given a reality free from love.” p. 117

Rob definitely has a more C.S. Lewis’ “The Great Divorce” view of the results of evil, that is, we create our own hell.

He talks about the origins of sacrifices, and the images the Biblical writers used in trying to describe what Christ did for us on the cross.

“They looked at the world around them, identifying examples, pictures, experiences, and metaphors that their listeners and readers would have already been familiar with, and then they essentially said: What happened on the cross is like…a defendant going free, a relationship being reconciled, something lost being redeemed, a battle being won, a final sacrifice being offered, so that no one ever has to offer another one again.” p. 129

But then he goes on to say:

“There’s nothing wrong with talking and singing about how the “blood will never lose its power” and “Nothing but the blood will save us.” Those are powerful metaphors. But we don’t live any longer in a culture in which people offer animal sacrifices to the gods.” p. 129

In essence, Jesus’ blood only metaphorically saved us. Hmmm. Really? Wow. That does not sit well with me at all. I understand the importance of interpreting the Bible in the context of the culture and time in which it was written, but I think Rob crossed the line here. God is the one who set up the system of sacrifices, not us. He’s the one who said the life is in the blood, and blood is required to atone for sin. I do not think it wise to write it off as merely “metaphorical.”

The last chapter has some great points about the Good News of God.

“I have sat with many Christian leaders over the years who are burned out, washed up, fried, whose marriages are barely hanging on, whose kids are home while they parents are out at church meetings, who haven’t taken a vacation in forever-all because, like the older brother [in the prodigal son story], they have seen themselves as “slaving all these years.” They believe that they believe the right things and so they’re “saved,” but it hasn’t delivered the full life that it was supposed to, and so they’re bitter. Deep down they believe God has let them down. …and so they quietly suffer, thinking this is the good news.” p. 181

I think this is the most powerful part of the book. It challenges me to probe deeply into what I really think about God and his goodness, and about how I live out my faith. Is my life full or is it dry? Is my life full of peace and joy such that someone else wants the same thing?

The End.

I am glad for the points Rob raised; he’s definitely wrestling with the issues. But I left the book disappointed because he left a gaping hole in his conversation. He did not thoroughly address the overwhelming topic of the wrath of God toward the wicked. Wrath criss-crosses through Scripture and is the very basis of judgment and punishment. 

This is obviously a deep, deep subject. More than anything, I think “Love Wins” calls us to the need for a better theology of atonement and salvation, a better definition of how sin affects humanity, and a better understanding of God and his holiness.

 

 

 

 

Bible in the Dirt Wednesday: Did Scripture authors copycat their cultures in dealing with demons?

Amulet against Lamashtu Throughout history, people have been dealing with evil spirits, and it is no different in the pages of Scripture. Some would say that the writers of the Bible were merely mirroring their culture in the way that they dealt with demons.

Not true.

Ancient Near Eastern texts contain a multitude of incantations and magical spells whose sole purpose was to protect a person from evil spirits. These types of spells are called “apotropaic spells.” For example, in the Assyrian culture, a demon named Lamashtu was thought to attack pregnant women and kidnap babies as they breastfed. To protect themselves, women would wear a special amulet (see picture above) with a pendant of the god Pazuzu.

The famous Egyptian Book of the Dead contained almost 200 spells to be used in the underworld to protect oneself from demons, monsters and traps. These spells were crucial in helping a person attain immortality.

Demons were also present in non-biblical Jewish literature. In the apocryphal book of Tobit, a woman named Sarah is plagued by a demon named Asmodeus. Seven time she marries , only to be robbed of her husband on her wedding night – Asmodeus kills each of them. In the meantime, a man named Tobias has a foot almost eaten by a fish in the Tigris River. The angel Raphael tells him to catch the fish and take out its gall, heart and liver. If he burns the heart and liver in the presence of someone afflicted by a demon, the person will go free. Raphael then tells Tobias to marry Sarah. I’m sure Tobias wasn’t too keen on the idea, but Raphael assures him that he can overcome the demon with the fish heart and liver.

So Tobias marries Sarah, burns the fish liver and heart, beats the demon and they live happily ever after. Not only that, but Tobias uses the fish gall to cure his father’s blindness. The End.

Next up is the Testament of Solomon. This is a part of something called the Pseudepigrapha [soo-deh-pig-rafa], which is a fancy way of categorizing a story supposedly written by a famous Old Testament person, but in reality written by someone else. The Testament of Solomon was written around the third century. In the story, the angel Michael gives King Solomon a magical ring to control evil spirits and deliver people from affliction. With the ring, Solomon enslaves a demon named Lix Tetrax and forces him to throw rocks up to the workers in the temple.

Any of these stories would fit very well in a Harry Potter book, but would be ill at ease in the Bible because when we look at the way the authors of Scripture handle demons, it is completely different. Demons are not warded off by magic, nor are they utilized for work. They are overcome through the power of Christ.

In Matthew 8, Jesus casts a horde of demons out of two men and into a herd of pigs just by commanding them to go. Two chapters later, Jesus sends his disciples out into the countryside to preach the good news that the kingdom of heaven was near. They were to heal the sick, raise the dead and drive out demons.

And even though the Seven Son of Sceva (Acts 19) utilized Jesus’ name in their failed attempt to cast out a demon, it doesn’t appear that they were followers of Christ, therefore they had no connection to God’s power.

The authors of Scripture did not rely on the traditions of their cultures as they wrote about overcoming demons. They had experienced something totally new and all-consuming: the power of Jesus.

 

“Demons and Bible” (2005) in NIV Archaeological Study Bible (p. 1572). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan

http://www.king-tut.org.uk/egyptian-mummies/ancient-egyptian-magic.htm

http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~pardos/ArchiveSolIntro.html

http://heritage-key.com/world/amulet-used-protection-against-lamashtu-demon

 

 

 

“Jak” is available for purchase!

 
“Jak and the Scarlet Thread” is officially available for purchase! I finished setting up the details at 2:30am last night, had the first sale come through at 10:43 this morning (my friend Matt:)), and everything seems to be working just fine. 

I can’t wait for you and the young adults/tweens  in  your life to read it and see a picture of our Father that you may have never seen before.  

Click here to go to the “Jak and the Scarlet Thread” page.

It’s done! Jak and the Scarlet Thread…

I got the final hardcopy proof of “Jak and the Scarlet Thread” today, and it looks great! So I approved it and ordered the first batch; they will arrive within two weeks. When they get here I’ll activate the ‘store’ page on my website and then “Jak and the Scarlet Thread” will officially be for sale. The price will be $16.00 per book, and I will sign every copy I ship.

In September, I am planning on having at least one book signing party in Eau Claire. I would love to try some Skype digital book signings, too, so if you know of any school groups, youth groups, etc. around the world who might be open to connecting with an author (that’d be me), please let me know.  There is one Christian school who is considering using “Jak” in their curriculum this year. And so the next step of this journey is about to begin! 

Jak and the Scarlet Thread

by Nathan J. Anderson

Paperback
6″ x 9″ (15.24 x 22.86 cm)
Black & White on Cream Paper
460 pages

For more info on “Jak and the Scarlet Thread,” click here. 

 

 

 

 

Page 1 of 212»